Box 1
Contains 10 Results:
Tyler Mining Company, Plaintiff, vs. Defendants of Bill of Exceptions No-4., Charles Sweeney, et al., Defendants, May 1983
The eleven typescripts of transcripts of testimony are arranged chronologically by date of case; the two oversize exhibits follow. Similar material dealing with Bunker Hill claims litigation may be found in MG 130.
All cases were heard in the United States Circuit Court, 9th Circuit, District of Idaho, Northern Division.
The Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining and Concentrating Company, Plaintiff, vs. The Empire State-Idaho Mining and Development Company, and the Last Chance Mining Company, Defendants, November 1899
The eleven typescripts of transcripts of testimony are arranged chronologically by date of case; the two oversize exhibits follow. Similar material dealing with Bunker Hill claims litigation may be found in MG 130.
All cases were heard in the United States Circuit Court, 9th Circuit, District of Idaho, Northern Division.
Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining and Concentrating Company, Plaintiff, vs. Empire State-Idaho Mining and Developing Company, and The Last Chance Mining Company, Defendants. No.138, November 1899
The eleven typescripts of transcripts of testimony are arranged chronologically by date of case; the two oversize exhibits follow. Similar material dealing with Bunker Hill claims litigation may be found in MG 130.
All cases were heard in the United States Circuit Court, 9th Circuit, District of Idaho, Northern Division.
Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining and Concentrating Company, Plaintiff, vs. Empire State-Idaho Mining and Developing Company Defendant, No.211, November 1900
The eleven typescripts of transcripts of testimony are arranged chronologically by date of case; the two oversize exhibits follow. Similar material dealing with Bunker Hill claims litigation may be found in MG 130.
All cases were heard in the United States Circuit Court, 9th Circuit, District of Idaho, Northern Division.
The Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining and Concentrating Company, Plaintiff, vs. F.C. Ramsey, U.S. Marshall for the District of Idaho, and Last Chance Mining Company, Defendants. Depositions of witnesses taken ... before Joseph A. Sladen, Clerk, United States Circuit Court, District of Oregon, January 1901
The eleven typescripts of transcripts of testimony are arranged chronologically by date of case; the two oversize exhibits follow. Similar material dealing with Bunker Hill claims litigation may be found in MG 130.
All cases were heard in the United States Circuit Court, 9th Circuit, District of Idaho, Northern Division.
Empire State-Idaho Mining and Developing Company, Complainant, vs. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining and Concentrating Company, Respondent, No.159; Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining and Concentrating Company, Complainant, vs. Empire State-Idaho Mining and Developing Company, Respondent, No.143, May 1901
The eleven typescripts of transcripts of testimony are arranged chronologically by date of case; the two oversize exhibits follow. Similar material dealing with Bunker Hill claims litigation may be found in MG 130.
All cases were heard in the United States Circuit Court, 9th Circuit, District of Idaho, Northern Division.
Patrick Clark, Benjamin C. Kingsbury, James Clark and James P. Harvey, Complainants, vs. Buffalo Hump Mining Company, and Empire State-Idaho Mining and Developing Company, Defendants, No.247, October 1901
The eleven typescripts of transcripts of testimony are arranged chronologically by date of case; the two oversize exhibits follow. Similar material dealing with Bunker Hill claims litigation may be found in MG 130.
All cases were heard in the United States Circuit Court, 9th Circuit, District of Idaho, Northern Division.
Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining and Concentrating Company, Complainant, vs. Last Chance Mining Company; Shoshone Mining Company; Empire State-Idaho Mining and Developing Corporation, Respondents, No.232 in Equity, May 1902
The eleven typescripts of transcripts of testimony are arranged chronologically by date of case; the two oversize exhibits follow. Similar material dealing with Bunker Hill claims litigation may be found in MG 130.
All cases were heard in the United States Circuit Court, 9th Circuit, District of Idaho, Northern Division.
Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining and Concentrating Company, Complainant, vs. Empire State-Idaho Mining and Developing Company, Respondent, No.270, September 1902
The eleven typescripts of transcripts of testimony are arranged chronologically by date of case; the two oversize exhibits follow. Similar material dealing with Bunker Hill claims litigation may be found in MG 130.
All cases were heard in the United States Circuit Court, 9th Circuit, District of Idaho, Northern Division.
Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining and Concentrating Company, Plaintiff, vs. Empire State-Idaho Mining & Developing Company, Defendant, No.227, November 1902
The eleven typescripts of transcripts of testimony are arranged chronologically by date of case; the two oversize exhibits follow. Similar material dealing with Bunker Hill claims litigation may be found in MG 130.
All cases were heard in the United States Circuit Court, 9th Circuit, District of Idaho, Northern Division.